HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis provision by U.S. health centers in 2021.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) provision in U.S. health centers. DESIGN: The U.S. Ending the HIV Epidemic (EHE) initiative designated health centers as the main healthcare system through which PrEP scale-up occurs. Health centers offer primary care to over 30 million disproportionately uninsured, racially or ethnically minoritized, and low-income patients. This study is the first to assess PrEP provision across health centers, including characteristics of clinics, patient populations, and policies associated with PrEP prescribing. METHODS: The Health Resources and Services Administration's Uniform Data System contained aggregate data on PrEP prescriptions and patient sociodemographics at health centers from January 1 through December 31, 2021, in 50 U.S. states, the District of Columbia, and eight U.S. territories. We compared patient demographics and availability of Medicaid expansion and PrEP assistance programs at health centers that prescribed vs. those that did not prescribe PrEP. RESULTS: Across 1375 health centers serving 30 193 278 patients, 79 163 patients were prescribed PrEP. Health centers that prescribed any PrEP had higher proportions of sexual, gender, racial, and ethnic minority patient populations compared with health centers that prescribed no PrEP. Compared with health centers that prescribed no PrEP, a higher proportion of health centers that prescribed PrEP were located in designated high-priority jurisdictions of the EHE initiative or states with Medicaid expansion or public PrEP assistance programs. CONCLUSION: Health centers are critical for scaling up PrEP in minoritized populations disproportionately affected by HIV, facilitated through federal and state-level policies. These findings highlight service gaps and inform future interventions to optimize PrEP implementation and support EHE initiative goals.

Training Health Center Staff in the Provision of Culturally Responsive Care for Sexual and Gender Minority Patients: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Purpose: The study was designed to evaluate whether an educational intervention to train the health center (HC) staff to optimize care for sexual and gender minority (SGM) patients could improve documentation of sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) and increase preventive screenings. Methods: Twelve HCs were matched and randomized to either receive a tailored, multicomponent educational intervention or a 1-hour prerecorded webinar. Documentation of SGM status and clinical testing was measured through analysis of data that HCs report annually. Nonparametric statistics were used to assess associations between baseline HC characteristics and outcome measures. Results: The HCs were geographically, racially, and ethnically diverse. In all but one HC, <10% of the patients were identified as SGM. Intervention HCs underwent between 3 and 10 trainings, which were highly acceptable. In 2018, 9 of 12 HCs documented SO and 11 of 12 documented GI for at least 50% of their patients. Five of 6 intervention HCs increased SO documentation by 2020, compared to 3 of 6 control HCs (nonsignificant, NS). Five intervention HCs increased GI documentation, although generally by less than 10%, compared to 2 of the controls (NS). Intervention HCs tended to increase documentation of preventive services more than control HCs, but the changes were NS. Conclusions: An educational intervention designed to train the HC staff to provide culturally responsive services for SGM patients was found to be acceptable, with favorable, but nonsignificant changes. Further refinement of the intervention using a larger sample of HCs might demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach. Clinical trial registration #: NCT03554785.

Decreased Anogenital Gonorrhea and Chlamydia in Transgender and Gender Diverse Primary Care Patients Receiving Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) adults in the U.S. experience health disparities, including in anogenital sexually transmitted infections (STI). Gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) is known to be medically necessary and improve health. Few studies have assessed the effect of GAHT on STI diagnoses. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of GAHT delivered in primary care as an intervention to improve STI outcomes for TGD adults. DESIGN: LEGACY is a longitudinal, multisite cohort study of adult TGD primary care patients from two federally qualified community health centers in Boston, MA, and New York, NY. PARTICIPANTS: Electronic health record data for eligible adult TGD patients contributed to the LEGACY research data warehouse (RDW). A total of 6330 LEGACY RDW patients were followed from 2016 to 2019, with 2555 patients providing STI testing data. MAIN MEASURES: GAHT exposure was being prescribed hormones, and the clinical outcome was anogenital gonorrhea or chlamydia diagnoses. Log-Poisson generalized estimating equations assessed the effect of prescription GAHT on primary outcomes, adjusting for age, race, ethnicity, gender identity, poverty level, health insurance, clinical site, and cohort years. KEY RESULTS: The median age was 28 years (IQR = 13); the racial breakdown was 20.4% Black, 8.1% Multiracial, 6.9% Asian/Pacific Islander, 1.8% Other; 62.8% White; 21.3% Hispanic/Latinx; 47.0% were assigned female at birth, and 16.0% identified as nonbinary. 86.3% were prescribed hormones. Among those tested, the percentage of patients with a positive anogenital STI diagnosis ranged annually from 10.0 to 12.5% between 2016 and 2019. GAHT prescription was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of anogenital STI diagnosis (aRR = 0.75; 95% CI = 0.59-0.96) over follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: GAHT delivered in primary care was associated with less STI morbidity in this TGD cohort over follow-up. Patients may benefit from individualized and tailored clinical care alongside GAHT to optimize STI outcomes.

Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Data Completeness at US Federally Qualified Health Centers, 2020 and 2021.

Objectives. To assess the performance of US federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) after 6 years of required sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) data reporting and update estimated proportions of sexual and gender minorities cared for at FQHCs. Methods. We conducted secondary analyses of data reported to the 2020 and 2021 Uniform Data System from 1297 FQHCs caring for nearly 30 000 000 patients annually. We used multivariable logistic regression to explore FQHC-level and patient-level factors associated with SOGI data completeness. Results. SOGI data were missing for 29.1% and 24.0% of patients, respectively. Among patients with reported SOGI data, 3.5% identified as sexual minorities and 1.5% identified as gender minorities. Southern FQHCs and those caring for more low-income and Black patients were more likely to have above-average SOGI data completeness. Larger FQHCs were more likely to have below-average SOGI data completeness. Conclusions. Substantial increases in SOGI data completeness at FQHCs over 6 years reflect the success of reporting mandates. Future research is needed to identify other patient-level and FQHC-level factors contributing to residual levels of SOGI data missingness. (Am J Public Health. 2023;113(8):883-892. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2023.307323).

Validation of an administrative algorithm for transgender and gender diverse persons against self-report data in electronic health records.

OBJECTIVE: To adapt and validate an algorithm to ascertain transgender and gender diverse (TGD) patients within electronic health record (EHR) data. METHODS: Using a previously unvalidated algorithm of identifying TGD persons within administrative claims data in a multistep, hierarchical process, we validated this algorithm in an EHR data set with self-reported gender identity. RESULTS: Within an EHR data set of 52 746 adults with self-reported gender identity (gold standard) a previously unvalidated algorithm to identify TGD persons via TGD-related diagnosis and procedure codes, and gender-affirming hormone therapy prescription data had a sensitivity of 87.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 86.4-88.2), specificity of 98.7% (95% CI 98.6-98.8), positive predictive value (PPV) of 88.7% (95% CI 87.9-89.4), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 98.5% (95% CI 98.4-98.6). The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.930 (95% CI 0.925-0.935). Steps to further categorize patients as presumably TGD men versus women based on prescription data performed well: sensitivity of 97.6%, specificity of 92.7%, PPV of 93.2%, and NPV of 97.4%. The AUC was 0.95 (95% CI 0.94-0.96). CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of self-reported gender identity data, an algorithm to identify TGD patients in administrative data using TGD-related diagnosis and procedure codes, and gender-affirming hormone prescriptions performs well.

Health Center Leadership Perspectives Regarding Barriers to and Facilitators of Providing Culturally Responsive Care for Sexual and Gender Minority Patients.

Purpose: This study identified barriers and facilitators associated with providing culturally responsive care for sexual and gender minority (SGM) patients at federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) in the United States, from the perspective of clinical leadership. Methods: Between July and December 2018, 23 semistructured, in-depth qualitative interviews were held with clinical leaders representing six FQHCs residing in rural and urban settings. Stakeholders included Chief Executive Officer, Executive Director, Chief Medical Officer, Medical Director, Clinic Site Director, and Nurse Manager positions. Interview transcripts were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. Results: Barriers included personnel factors related to lack of training and fear, competing priorities, and environments that focused on treating all patients similarly. Facilitators included established partnerships with external organizations, staff with prior SGM training and knowledge, and active initiatives in clinic settings targeting SGM care. Conclusions: Clinical leadership expressed strong support for evolving their FQHCs into organizations that provide culturally responsive care for their SGM patients. FQHC staff across all levels of clinical care would benefit from regularly occurring training sessions on culturally responsive care for SGM patients. To ensure sustainability, improve staff buy-in, and mitigate the impact of staff turnover, improving culturally competent care for SGM patients should be a shared goal and responsibility for leadership, medical providers, and administrative staff. CTN Registration: NCT03554785.

Clinical and Behavioral Outcomes for Transgender Women Engaged in HIV Care: Comparisons to Cisgender Men and Women in the Centers for AIDS Research Network of Integrated Clinical Systems (CNICS) Cohort.

Describe health of transgender women (TW) with HIV vs. cisgender men and women (CM, CW) in a U.S. HIV care cohort. Data were from Centers for AIDS Research Network of Integrated Clinical Systems (CNICS), 2005-2022. TW were identified using clinical data/identity measures. PWH (n = 1285) were included in analyses (275 TW, 547 CM, 463 CW). Cross-sectional multivariable analyses compared HIV outcomes/co-morbidities between TW/CM and TW/CW, and adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated. TW had poorer adherence (> 90% adherent; aOR 0.57; 95%CI 0.38, 0.87) and were more likely to miss ≥ 3 visits in the past year than CM (aOR 1.50, 95%CI 1.06, 2.10); indicated more anxiety compared to both CM and CW (p ≤ 0.001, p = 0.02); hepatitis C infection (p = 0.03) and past-year/lifetime substance treatment (p = 0.004/p = 0.001) compared to CM; and substance use relative to CW. TW with HIV differed in HIV clinical outcomes and co-morbidities from CM and CW.

Suicidal Ideation Disparities Among Transgender and Gender Diverse Compared to Cisgender Community Health Patients.

BACKGROUND: Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) individuals experience more severe psychological distress and may be at higher risk for suicide compared to cisgender individuals. The existing literature largely consists of small-sample studies that do not assess subgroup differences. OBJECTIVE: To examine rates of self-reported suicidal ideation among four TGD groups compared to cisgender individuals. DESIGN: Data were extracted from the electronic health records of patients receiving primary care at a community health center specializing in sexual and gender minority health. A logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between sociodemographic variables and the presence of current suicidal ideation. PARTICIPANTS: 29,988 patients receiving care at a community health center in Northeastern US between 2015 and 2018. MAIN MEASURES: Demographic questionnaire, 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire KEY RESULTS: Younger age, sexual and gender minority identity, and public/grants-based insurance were associated with significantly higher odds of suicidal ideation. Relative to cisgender men, transgender men (OR=2.08; 95% CI=1.29-3.36; p=.003), transgender women (OR=3.08; 95% CI=2.05-4.63; p<.001), nonbinary (NB) individuals assigned male at birth (AMAB; OR=3.55; 95% CI=1.86-6.77; p<001), and NB individuals assigned female at birth (AFAB; OR=2.49; 95% CI=1.52-4.07; p<001) all endorsed significantly higher odds of current suicidal ideation, controlling for age, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, and insurance status. Larger proportions of transgender women (23.6%) and NB AMAB individuals (26.7%) reported suicidal ideation not only compared to cisgender men (6.1%) and women (6.6%), but also compared to transgender men (17.4%; χ2[5, n=25,959]=906.454, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: TGD patients were at significantly increased risk of suicidal ideation, even after accounting for age, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, and insurance status. Findings suggest distinct risk profiles by assigned sex at birth. Consistent assessment of and intervention for suicidal ideation should be prioritized in settings that serve TGD patients.

Will clinical standards not be part of the choir? Harmonization between the HL7 gender harmony project model and the NASEM measuring sex, gender identity, and sexual orientation report in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: To propose an approach for semantic and functional data harmonization related to sex and gender constructs in electronic health records (EHRs) and other clinical systems for implementors, as outlined in the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) report Measuring Sex, Gender Identity, and Sexual Orientation and the Health Level 7 (HL7) Gender Harmony Project (GHP) product brief "Gender Harmony-Modeling Sex and Gender Representation, Release 1." MATERIALS AND METHODS: Authors from both publications contributed to a plan for data harmonization based upon fundamental principles in informatics, including privacy, openness, access, legitimate infringement, least intrusive alternatives, and accountability. RESULTS: We propose construct entities and value sets that best align with both publications to allow the implementation of EHR data elements on gender identity, recorded sex or gender, and sex for clinical use in the United States. We include usability- and interoperability-focused reasoning for each of these decisions, as well as suggestions for cross-tabulation for populations. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Both publications agree on core approaches to conceptualization and measurement of sex- and gender-related constructs. However, some clarifications could improve our ability to assess gender modality, alignment (or lack thereof) between gender identity and assigned gender at birth, and address both individual-level and population-level health inequities. By bridging the GHP and NASEM recommendations, we provide a path forward for implementation of sex- and gender-related EHR elements. Suggestions for implementation of gender identity, recorded sex or gender, and sex for clinical use are provided, along with semantic and functional justifications.

Wide Variability in Documentation of Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity, and Preventive Health Screenings in a Diverse Sample of U.S. Community Health Centers.

Purpose: This study was conducted to characterize documentation of sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) and provision of screening and preventive services in a diverse sample of community health centers (CHCs). Methods: Twelve CHCs provided data submitted to the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) in 2018 from their Uniform Data System (UDS) reports. Prevalence of SOGI documentation, screenings, and preventive services were calculated. Sociodemographic correlates of documentation were analyzed using Fisher's exact test and Wilcoxon rank sum/Mann-Whitney U test. Results: Patient data recording sexual orientation (SO) were missing in 2%-93% of UDS reports from the 12 CHCs, and gender identity (GI) data were missing from 0% to 96% of UDS reports. CHCs were most likely to report body mass index and tobacco screening and least likely to report hepatitis A or B vaccination, independent of SO or GI. Transgender females were less likely to have mammography documented than cisgender females. Transgender males were less likely to have anal Pap tests, be vaccinated for hepatitis B, or be referred for risky alcohol use compared to cisgender males. Patients who identified as "another gender" were less likely to be referred for risky alcohol use, undergo mammography or anal Pap testing, or receive hepatitis A vaccination than cisgender people. Individuals who did not disclose their GI were less likely to be vaccinated for hepatitis A or B than cisgender people. Conclusion: SOGI status was often not documented by a diverse array of CHCs. However, when SOGI status was documented, we saw evidence of disparities in preventive interventions and referrals, particularly for transgender patients. Clinical trial registration number: NCT03554785.

Pediatric sexual orientation and gender identity data collection in the electronic health record.

The systematic documentation of sexual orientation and gender identity data in electronic health records can improve patient-centered care and help to identify and address health disparities affecting sexual and gender minority populations. Although there are existing guidelines for sexual orientation and gender identity data among adult patients, there are not yet standard recommendations for pediatric patients. In this article, we discuss methods that pediatric primary care organizations can use to collect and document sexual orientation and gender identity information with children and adolescents in electronic health records. These recommendations take into consideration children's developmental stages, the role of caregivers, and the need to protect the privacy of this information. We also focus on the current limitations of electronic health records in capturing the nuances of sexual and gender minority identities and make suggestions for addressing these limitations.

Gender-Affirming Care Without Walls: Utilization of Telehealth Services by Transgender and Gender Diverse People at a Federally Qualified Health Center.

Purpose: This article characterizes a telehealth program implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic for transgender and gender diverse (TGD) patients at Fenway Health, a federally qualified health center in Boston, Massachusetts, specializing in gender and sexual minority health care. Telehealth is well positioned to meet TGD patients' health needs by allowing them to conveniently and safely engage in care. Methods: The COVID-19 pandemic has presented the opportunity to reimagine the way that Fenway Health provides care, by pivoting almost completely to a virtual model in response to this public health emergency. From March through August 2020, TGD patients (n=3189) from 24 U.S. states utilized our telehealth medical and behavioral health (BH) services. Results: Fenway Health cared for close to as many unique TGD patients during this 6-month period via telehealth as it did via in-person services during calendar year 2019 (3794 medical patients in 2019 vs. 3033 in March through August 2020 [95%]; 946 BH patients in 2019 vs. 911 in March through August 2020 [96%]). TGD patients who utilized telehealth had a similar demographic profile as those who used in-person services. Conclusion: Fenway Health quickly pivoted to telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic enabling gender-affirming care for TGD communities. By increasing access to clinicians trained in gender-affirming care, telehealth helps ensure that TGD patients regardless of geographic location can access crucial health services. Given the dearth of gender-affirming health care services across the United States, permanently removing state licensure requirements and payment parity for telehealth could ensure access to more gender-responsive care across state lines.

Patterns of E-Cigarette Use Among Primary Care Patients at an Urban Community Center.

Tobacco use remains the leading cause of preventable disease and death in the US. The number of tobacco products has grown over the past decade. E-cigarette use has increased rapidly in recent years, but patterns and correlates of use have not been thoroughly assessed. We examined relationships among demographic factors, e-cigarette and conventional cigarette use in a large sample (N = 12,409) of adult patients at a community health center in the Northeastern US. Overall, 13% (N = 1675) of the sample reported ever using e-cigarettes. In logistic regression models, ever having used e-cigarettes was associated with younger age (ages 18-25; OR = 3.5, p < 0.001). Being transgender (OR = 1.8, p < 0.001), bisexual (OR = 1.5, p < 0.001), un-partnered (OR = 1.5, p < 0.001), having a lower income (OR = 1.6, p < 0.001) or a high BMI (OR = 1.4, p = 0.009) were associated with increased odds of use, whereas being a woman (OR = 0.7, p < 0.001) or Black/African American (OR = 0.7, p = 0.007) were associated with lower odds of use. Of the participants who reported e-cigarette use, a majority also endorsed current or former use of conventional cigarettes. Individuals who formerly used conventional cigarettes were nearly three times more likely to report daily e-cigarette use than current users. Among primary care patients at a community health center, e-cigarette use was reported by a sizeable portion of the sample. Overall, odds of use were higher in certain patient populations, and individuals who formally used cigarettes were more likely to report e-cigarette use than individuals who currently smoke, suggesting that e-cigarettes may be functioning as a cessation aid or a strategy to reduce conventional cigarette use.

Gender harmony: improved standards to support affirmative care of gender-marginalized people through inclusive gender and sex representation.

OBJECTIVE: Accurate representation of clinical sex and gender identity in interoperable clinical systems is a major challenge for organizations intent on improving outcomes for sex- and gender-marginalized people. Improved data collection has been hindered by the historical approach that presumed a single, often binary, datum was sufficient. We describe the Health Level Seven International (HL7) Gender Harmony logical model that proposes an improved approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The proposed solution was developed via an American National Standards Institute (ANSI)-certified collaborative balloted process. As an HL7 Informative Document, it is an HL7 International-balloted consensus on the subject of representing sex and representing gender in clinical systems based on work of the gender harmony project led by the HL7 Vocabulary Work Group. RESULTS: The Gender Harmony Model is a logical model that provides a standardized approach that is both backwards-compatible and an improvement to the meaningful capture of gender identity, recorded sex or recorded gender, a sex for clinical use, the name to use, and pronouns that are affirmative and inclusive of gender-marginalized people. CONCLUSION: Most clinical systems and current standards in health care do not meaningfully address, nor do they consistently represent, sex and gender diversity, which has impeded interoperability and led to suboptimal health care. The Gender Harmony Project was formed to create more inclusive health information exchange standards to enable a safer, higher-quality, and embracing healthcare experience. The Gender Harmony Model provides the informative guidance for standards developers to implement a more thorough technical design that improves the narrow binary design used in many legacy clinical systems.

Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Data Collection at US Health Centers: Impact of City-Level Structural Stigma in 2018.

Objectives. To examine the relationship between city-level structural stigma pertaining to sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) and completeness of patient SOGI data collection at US federally qualified health centers (FQHCs). Methods. We used the Human Rights Campaign's Municipal Equality Index to quantify city-level structural stigma against sexual and gender minority people in 506 US cities across 49 states. We ascertained the completeness of SOGI data collection at FQHCs from the 2018 Uniform Data System, which describes FQHC patient demographics and service utilization. We included FQHCs in cities captured by the structural stigma index in multinomial generalized linear mixed models to examine the relationship between city-level structural stigma and SOGI data completeness. Results. FQHCs in cities with more protective sexual orientation nondiscrimination policies reported more complete patient sexual orientation data (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.2, 2.1). This association was also found for gender identity nondiscrimination policies and gender identity data collection (AOR = 1.7; 95% CI = 1.3, 2.2). Conclusions. Municipal sexual and gender minority nondiscrimination laws are associated with social and municipal environments that facilitate patient SOGI data collection.(Am J Public Health. 2021;111(11):2059-2063. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306414).

Different functional traits among closely related algal symbionts dictate stress endurance for vital Indo-Pacific reef-building corals.

Reef-building corals in the genus Porites are one of the most important constituents of Indo-Pacific reefs. Many species within this genus tolerate abnormally warm water and exhibit high specificity for particular kinds of endosymbiotic dinoflagellates that cope with thermal stress better than those living in other corals. Still, during extreme ocean heating, some Porites exhibit differences in their stress tolerance. While corals have different physiological qualities, it remains unknown whether the stability and performance of these mutualisms is influenced by the physiology and genetic relatedness of their symbionts. We investigated two ubiquitous Pacific reef corals, Porites rus and Porites cylindrica, from warmer inshore and cooler offshore reef systems in Palau. While these corals harbored a similar kind of symbiont in the genus Cladocopium (within the ITS2 C15 subclade), rapidly evolving genetic markers revealed evolutionarily diverged lineages corresponding to each Porites species living in each reef habitat. Furthermore, these closely related Cladocopium lineages were differentiated by their densities in host tissues, cell volume, chlorophyll concentration, gross photosynthesis, and photoprotective pathways. When assessed using several physiological proxies, these previously undifferentiated symbionts contrasted in their tolerance to thermal stress. Symbionts within P. cylindrica were relatively unaffected by exposure to 32℃ for 14 days, whereas P. rus colonies lost substantial numbers of photochemically compromised symbionts. Heating reduced the ability of the offshore symbiont associated with P. rus to translocate carbon to the coral. By contrast, high temperatures enhanced symbiont carbon assimilation and delivery to the coral skeleton of inshore P. cylindrica. This study indicates that large physiological differences exist even among closely related symbionts, with significant implications for thermal susceptibility among reef-building Porites.

Mental Health and Substance Use Diagnoses and Treatment Disparities by Sexual Orientation and Gender in a Community Health Center Sample.

Purpose: This study assessed disparities in screener- and provider-identified mental health and substance use diagnoses and treatment attendance by sexual orientation and gender in an urban community health center focused on sexual and gender minority individuals. Methods: Using an electronic data query (October 2015 to October 2018), computerized screening results assessing likely depression, anxiety, alcohol use disorder (AUD), and substance use disorder (SUDs); provider diagnoses; and treatment initiation related to mental health and substance use were compared across sexual orientation (heterosexual, gay/lesbian, bisexual, and other) and gender categories (men and women, inclusive of cisgender and transgender individuals; N = 24,325). Results: Bisexual and other-identified individuals were more likely to screen positive for depression and anxiety, followed by gay/lesbian women, compared with heterosexual individuals and gay men (χ2 = 463.22, p < 0.001 and χ2 = 263.36, p < 0.001, respectively). Of those who screened positive for AUDs, women were less likely to be diagnosed by a professional (χ2 = 63.79, p < 0.001) and of those who screened positive for either alcohol or other SUDs, women were less likely to attend one or more substance use-related behavioral health appointments, regardless of sexual orientation (contingency coefficient = 0.14, p < 0.001). Conclusion: This community health center study identified a need for increased mental health services for bisexual and other-identified individuals and increased assessment and initiation of substance use treatment for women, including sexual minority women.